DEITY SMHEITY

The title of this guy's blog speaks for itself. His commentary of the Nicene Creed is fuckin' brilliant, especially where Mary, Mother of Jesus in concerned (seriously, has there ever been a Mary porno? You'd think the Catholics would have made one by now, and numerous sequels besides). Here is a man after my own heart. Here ya go, kiddies.

QUOTE OF THE DAY

 So my old friend over at Debunking Christianity, GearHedEd, has just recently demolished the existence of the Abrahamic god in one brief comment. Answer it if you can, theists.

"A: Perfection is complete; needs nothing. For YHWH to create something (anything) indicates a state of imperfection that needed to be redressed. Question for Christians, theologians, apologists and theistic philosophers: Given arguendo that the act of "Creation" entails at a minimum a CHANGE from a previous state, how do you reconcile the fact that this creates a dilemma for perfection? Either "perfect" wasn't good enough and therefore NOT perfect and in need of change, or alternately that change is a 'better' form of perfection. Now, given that "perfect" is already superlative (there can be no "degrees" of perfection; something is either perfect or less than perfect), how can change make perfection "better"? (=FAIL #1--God is not perfect, according to the Bible).
B: Exodus 20:3. There are other gods; YHWH admits as much through prohibiting worship of them.(=FAIL #2--YHWH is in competition with other gods for the attention, and gets jealous when He's not first in line).
C: Free Will (Christian version). We must have free will, because we must be free to "reject God"... Puhleeeeze... If YHWH is the Creator, and gave Man free will, He has no business telling us how to use it. To give a gift, and then dictate how it must be used is no gift. Furthermore, to say that we must have a "free choice" whether to love God (because He loves us so much that if we don't love him back He'll torture us for all eternity...) flies in the face of the idea that we'll be punished if we make the wrong choice. (=FAIL #3--*True Love* doesn't come with conditions, especially ones that cause those who "reject" it to burn for eternity).
D: "Evil" doesn't exist. Everything is relative. We call things "evil" when the results aren't favorable. But maybe it was favorable for someone else...? The whole concept of "evil" (definition includes malicious intent by some 'agent') is based on a conceptual framework that includes invisible malevolent "forces" that capriciously choose who gets fucked under and who doesn't. Here's a tip, Christians: everything is neutral, and randomized. There is no cosmic battle between the "Forces of Good" and the "Forces of Evil". Life sucks (or it doesn't--it's up to YOU), and then you die. (=FAIL #4--There's no "afterlife", Christians. Get over it and start living instead of pining for the grave)."

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

Posted by b__e at Debunking Christianity, in response to Lucian;

"Lucian, but the Bible is no help with resolving good and evil anyway.  God kills infants while saying murder is wrong, sends lying spirits while telling people not to bear false witness, tells us we should not punish the innocent but curses all of Adam's decendants, has people killed in barbaric and horrible ways for such "crimes" as picking up sticks yet tells people to be kind, tortures people for eternity in hell while all while claiming mercy is essential.  He says he's "coming soon" when it has been 2000 yrs.  He gives us His "word" but it is intellgible and people have been fighting over what its contradictory message means for centuries.  This God not only does not exist-- but the myths about him have generated all sort of unnecessary and irrelevant arguments."

DANIEL KNIGHT'S E-MAILS TO YOURS TRULY

So apparently, Daniel Knight, the arrogant little punk responsible for the misinformation and bare-faced lies I refuted a couple days ago in my giant fundamentalism post, responded via e-mail, which explains the fruitless wait of the past couple days. Here is his first e-mail;

"I have posted a refutation of this… rubbish at my site. Come and debate me if you fell up to the challenge."

And you're the first to try this mr. christopher columbus? dude, it's already established that atheists are loony morons who can't think straight. look at the dumb comments here: http://toparguments.tk

You're simply denying 2+2 in whatever form it is, complex or not. Simply: atheists are biased hypocrites who DONT care about truth, and often are deluded into thinking they do. So hell no, not after 1000 arguments already (very repetitve) from atheists, all showing themselves to be futile morons, will i keep listening to no end to your supposed refutations. Get a life, stop denying the obvious and stop being a self righteous hypocrite, and sad for u, the key is Jesus, you must worship your God, and not your corrupt lowlife self. Otherwise: absolutely go to Hell. You're a moron who judges by mere appearances. When u see Jesus u AUTOMATICALLY think "stupid". Which means: YOU ARE STUPID, because u judge with presumption and based on what simply sounds absurd. In other words, your nonsensical and shallow. Goodbye guy who judges by assumptions and names.

Notice how is he is obviously projecting his own attributes upon me. He makes absurd, sweeping generalizations about atheists (with no proof beyond his own assertions), and then tells me that I'm a "guy who judges by assumptions and names". Mental projection 101. Not to mention that irony of him telling me to get a life when he's the one who's written over 700 posts that all boil down to, "UR STUPID IF U DONT AGREE WITH EVERYTHIN I SAYZ!!!" And how am I the self-righteous hypocrite? I'm not the one who thinks that he's part of "The Elect", Danny boy; that bullshit is what you believe. My, he sure did interpret a lot into one sentence, didn't he? But lo, it gets even more entertaining.

oh and, you read a refutation. you cant refute facts. ur the type that thinks, "no indirect evidence isnt evidence, now read MY INDIRECT EVIDENCE" as if that's ultimate proof. No moron you cant make the bible contradict if it doesnt OR REALITY. Your like a moron Christian who says oh see it says dont lie, but here's a lie in the bible! yet keeps calling yourself a Christian! NO "CHRISTIAN" GOD DOESNT LIE, NO "ATHEISTS WHO IS FOR REALITY, YOU CANNOT MAKE REALITY CONTRADICT". SEA FOSSILS ON LAND MORON. SAY THAT TO YOURSELF OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER TILL YOU WASH THE BRAINWASH OUT OF YOUR SILLY MIND. SEA FOSSILS ON LAND, MOUNTAIN TOPS, ALL OVER OF THE WORLD, STOP BEING A MASSIVE MORON. SEE THE GRAND CANYON? THAT WASNT MADE BY MAGIC IDIOT. Stop with the arbitrary "well dur one day der waf an ocean here, n den uh dur one day an ocean was here, oh and here too, uh dur and uh yeah dey werent not at same times, dat why uh dey all have fossils on da land" HUH:?
NOT ALL THE SAME TIME THATS WHY YOU FIND THEM ALL IN THE SAME PLACE? THE HELL? SO ON TOP AND IN THE GROUND ALL OVER ISNT EVIDENCE OF A FLOOD? ARE YOU RETARDED?

This is the best one, as far as I'm concerned. I especially love his crushing arguments for a young earth. Sea fossils on land are explained very simply through continental rifting and tectonic plate movements; some plates are subducted under the other, and thus go underwater. Likewise, fossilized sea creatures on mountain tops is explained the same way (see "orogeny"). "NOT ALL THE SAME TIME THATS WHY YOU FIND THEM ALL IN THE SAME PLACE?" Danny boy, if you could cite an actual instance where organisms from say, the modern era were found deposited in the same layer as a T. Rex, you just might have something. As it is, you have straw-men and an abysmal ignorance of geology. From your spelling, grammar, and tone, I'd say that you're either some pissed off little pre-adolescent or someone operating on the same developmental level. And how does Danny boy explain the fossils that died in desert, or tropical environment, sans water? Hmm? Yeah, that's what I thought. "SEE THE GRAND CANYON? THAT WASNT MADE BY MAGIC IDIOT." Once again; projection. Geology has proven that the Grand Canyon was formed by erosion over several million years. The creationist alternative? A magical, invisible man-god named Yahweh got pissed off at mankind for killing each other, so he decided to solve the issue in the most humane, rational manner possible; by killing all of them. However, a drunken 93 year old by the name of Noah was spared because he was a straight kid who didn't run around in the da hood, so God made him build a giant--barge? Boat? Well, it's ripping off Gilgamesh so who cares?--to survive a flood he was sending. Oh, and this was the first time anyone had seen rain, so I guess that humans were also cannibals. So the whole earth is flooded, and the flood magically erodes a long, narrow canyon--without affecting the surrounding area (this flood could cancel the laws of physics, I guess). So yeah, you're one who believes in magic, Danny boy; except that your name for it is "GOD".

And now for his final bit of hand-waving (this shit is great!);

moron did you notice ive already said ive been through all your supposed refutations? these arent things i wrong out of the blue, they are responses to dimwits like yourself who come up with shit out of the blue, get that? it says FOR BEGINNERS MORON, OK? BEGINNEEERS. See how clues you fucking are? And dingbat, did you notice the list of books dingbat? So what you do mean asshole, "up to the challenge" like ive never done any thinking or work idiot? Notice my journal is filled with links? Idiot? Arrogant casual smug ass troll? DUR? DO I LIKE LIKE I NEVER HEARD MORONS LIKE U?

NOTICE THE TOP ARGUMENTS MORON?

NOTICE MY BIO WHICH SAYS IVE BEEN READING UR SHIT FOR YEARS?

20 YEARS IDIOT.

500 DOCUMENTED ARGUMENTS OF MY OWN, NOTICE ALSO THE LIST OF CONTRADICTION REFUTING SITES?

U R AN OBLIVIOUS MORON WHO WAVES OFF ANYTHING THAT DOES NOT AGREE WITH YOUR FEELINGS, YOU AR EA SHAMEFUL IDIOT A LOWLIFE. You're a dismissive arrogant narcissist idiot.

Listen to how dumb you are, "no dat rubbish bible say not lie, dat is bad to not lie" HUH!?

Grow up stupid. The Bible says to ignore arguments of ignorance, and ur obviously one massive moron.

LOL, the guy who really thinks that he knows more than 99.99% of all scientists--despite having no scientific credentials whatsoever--is calling me an "arrogant [N]narcissist idiot", when he fits that bill perfectly. Me? Oh, I've probably been a tad arrogant at times--but never to the extent of thinking that I am superior to most humans, as I'm a "Chosen One". I also love how all three e-mails are just loud, stupid, obnoxious straw-man rants--provoked by one sentence. Danny is in an advanced state of Dunning/Kruger; any challenge of his imaginary authority, no matter how small, threatens his ego and requires immediate attention. Like I've said elsewhere; to be a YEC is to engage in the most convoluted mental gymnastics possible, and requires either an willingness to lie, or a grade-school level ignorance of science. Dunning/Kruger, anyone? And deep down, Danny boy knows how truly inept he is; otherwise, he wouldn't be so afraid to come debate me. But, by conceding cowardice, he merely adds to my amusement, though at the same time I must confess myself to be slightly disappointed. I'd really hoped to gain a fundy troll to demonstrate the veracity of my accusations against YECs and fundies after each new post. Oh well. There are plenty of fish in the sea.

WHY DO PEOPLE LAUGH AT CREATIONISTS?

CALL OF CTHULHU: THE WASTED LAND

Red Wasp Design Ltd. has created an awesome new game for iPhone and PC.; one whose title is rather self-explanatory. And this piece of tentacled goodness will be dropping on the Android Market very soon. You can read about the game here. Ever wanted to fight and kill Germans, hordes of ravenous zombies and tentacled horrors on the bloody killing fields of World War I? Here's your chance! Just don't forget to feed the shoggoths...

Til next time, Cthulhu fh'tagn!!

THE VADER SESSIONS

CREATIONISM PICTURE SHOW

Why bothering arguing with people whose rebuttals to TOE consist of claiming that you would piss yourself if you laid eyes upon them? Why bother trying to have a rational discourse with idiots who can't even define the word "theory"? Why bother referring to the geologic column and the fossil record when only the Wholly Babble is true, and everything else is automatically wrong? Why debate mindless cretins with IQs in the single digits who just repeat bible verses as a mindless mantra against reality?

What's a raptor in da hood ta do? Bitch owed me money!!

Yes. Yes, it does; why didn't they make this a display at the Creation "Museum"?

Rabies is a bitch. So is a hungry seven-ton carnivore.

BECAUSE CONSERVATIVES KNOW IT'S TRUE

If Hitler was an atheist, he certainly did an excellent job of pretending to be a Christian, what with the explicit references he made to God and the bible throughout his Nuremburg speeches, and within Mein Kampf.